Accuracy before reach
Public claims stay as narrow as the evidence. Treomark updates or removes facts when the accepted record changes.
Editorial standards
Clear evidence. Clear ownership.
These standards govern how Treomark researches, labels, publishes, updates, and corrects provider information.
Sources stay visible
Published evidence keeps its source type, public link when available, and capture or review date so readers can inspect the basis directly.
Attribution follows the work
Pages name the responsible research group and accountable editor. Specialist review is credited only on the material that specialist actually reviewed.
Automation is accountable
Automation and AI assist collection, normalization, comparison, monitoring, and testing. Treomark's public schemas and accepted release process control what is published.
Corrections improve the record
Readers, providers, and source owners can challenge an exact fact. Treomark reviews the evidence, records the outcome, and updates the public record when warranted.
Commercial terms stay separate
Payments and provider products do not determine claim status, credentials, publication, source review, or organic ranking.
Editorial change policy
Changes follow the evidence
Factual corrections update the affected record and its review date. Material methodology changes receive a new method version and remain distinguishable from the prior version. Presentation improvements can ship without changing the meaning or status of accepted facts.
Questions about a page can be sent through the correction and dispute process. The public transparency baseline shows how the accepted dataset performs under the current method.